I can understand the idiocy when it comes to stuff like Art Direction (which I got right on Yahoo! and wrong on my blog - I apparently switched them. Good move, Staples. What did the SAT teach you? Go with your first instincts.) But, when it comes to technical awards, when I have actually seen some of the films, how do you miss those? In my picks, I said that I though Bourne Ultimatum should have won everything it was up for. And it did. But I didn't pick it. I overthought it. I also used that same logic with Original Screenplay - pointing out how the ultimate winner should win, but then picking something else. And best song. I pointed out how having three nominations hurt Dreamgirls, but then picked Enchanted to win. On my Box Office Mojo picks, I said the ultimate winning song "Should Win." In fact, if I had actually picked my "Should Win" picks on Box Office Mojo, I would have gotten seven right.
So I am an idiot. And I guess I have no right to even criticize the awards, so I won't. The only beef I had was with Visual Effects. It was the only category that I had seen all the nominees. And there was no way Golden Compass should have won. There were some great things in there - the fighting polar bears, the flying ships, the battle scene at the end. But Transformers had to create all the robots digitally and make them look real - which they were VERY real. And Pirates had so many effects - the maelstrom, Davy Jones, the multiple Jack Sparrows. Whatever. You don't get to gripe if you can't even get half right.
I was even off on the length of the show - by 36 minutes. But, see, I was basing that on if Michael Moore had actually won...
No comments:
Post a Comment