Americans are comfortable with a little bit of corruption. It almost is like we have grown to accept that it is just going to happen and we just need to deal with it. We have lived through so many different scandals that we have developed a very cynical nature. There have been so many movies based on government conspiracies that I would wager most Americans believe that there is always some level of conspiracy going on. It's just how it is.
There are two instances where Americans will no longer deal silently with corruption. The first is when it starts to affect our life - especially our wallet. As long as it is someone else's problem, it isn't a problem. But when it becomes my problem, then we have a problem. We had an animal living in the pond behind our house. Well, we have a lot of animals living out there: turtles, fish, ducks, Canadian geese. But we had this weird animal out there. I would see it swimming along from time to time. It looked like a beaver. I would see it slithering through and diving under the lily pads. I found out from some of my outdoorsy friends that it was a nutria - basically a giant river rat. I liked watching it. Well, one of my neighbors didn't think it was such a cute animal. Apparently its activities were infringing on my neighbor's happiness. The rat would come up into the lady's yard and eat her plants. It would gnaw on the wooden wall constructed to keep water out of the yard. And the leftovers from its snacks was clogging up our spillway, causing flooding in that yard. To me, it wasn't an issue. My yard has a very steep incline, so flooding is not a problem. I have a fence around my yard, so the rat wasn't going to come up on my property. But this lady starting making a stink. She had a few other homeowners on her side due to garden and flooding damage. She brought it before the HOA Board (which we both are on) and wanted us to pay to have the eradication done. On top of it all, she was all weird about the animal being killed - which we all knew would be the outcome. It was going to cost $800 to clear the pond. I asked how much it cost for a box of bullets. She didn't appreciate that suggestion. Now it became my problem. I didn't want the HOA to spend hundreds of dollars to pull this animal out. It wasn't bothering me, personally. I didn't even realize it was a problem at all. (Things have a funny way of working themselves out. The rat got run over by a car a couple of weeks later ... before we paid to clear the pond. I had nothing to do with it. Promise.)
This is kind of how we approach corruption in the US. It isn't my problem. It isn't hurting me. Don't rock the boat. But if it encroaches on my comfort, all heck breaks loose. Look at the investment banking scandal of a few years ago. Or the Enron/big business scandal. Or the subprime mortgage collapse. Or the automaker fiasco. Those issues had been bubbling for years. Was anyone surprised that financial advisors were cheating? I doubt that. What year did Wall Street come out? We had been through all of this before, just with different financial elements. Instead of junk bonds it was Ponzi schemes. Was the subprime mortgage problem a shock? How could it be? How long could banks hand out mortgages to people who couldn't afford to pay for them before the process collapsed? We know in the back of our minds that things are not always above board with companies, governments, industries, celebrities. But we turn a blind eye and convince ourselves things may be different this time. Until it interferes with our life.
The other instance were corruption gets us riled up is when it become blatant. This is kind of a corollary of the first instance. Instead of it interfering with our wallets or our lives, it interferes with our comfort. It makes us feel embarrassed and awkward. How could we have let this go on? It makes us look bad. We frequently see this with celebrities. We cut actors, musicians, "reality" stars a lot of slack in our country. It is like we know that they are going to make questionable choices and we are fine with that, as long as it is kept quiet. If they want to smoke weed, that's fine. Just don't do it in a park. If they want to do lines of coke in the bathroom at the Chateau Marmont, that's fine. Just don't film it and post it on Twitter. If they want to run a dog fighting ring, so be it. Just don't advertise the fights. When those private foibles become public scandals, we throw our hands up in mock indignation. "How could they do this?!?" What we are really asking is "how could they be so blatant in their stupidity?"
If you don't think this is accurate, I want you to think back a few years to the Michael Vick dog-fighting scandal. Vick was going along as a maddeningly erratic and fragile quarterback when we all started to hear about his involvement in a dog-fighting ring. There were the usual denials, followed by proof of the existence of the ring. Vick got arrested, tried, and imprisoned for his role in the whole thing. During the whole process, we heard about how this is a cultural issue. In the culture that Vick grew up, dog fighting was an acceptable practice. Vick didn't know that it was a problem. But it went public and we all went crazy. Now, think about this. In the years since Vick's dog fighting ring went public, how many dog fighting rings have you heard about being broken up by the cops? With the amount of public outrage over Vick's crimes, you would think dog fighting is completely detestable in our country. And in the dialogue, we kept hearing about how this was cultural - meaning that there are more of these rings going on right now. Thinking back to how people wanted Vick banned for life from the NFL and imprisoned for a hundred years, shouldn't we have formed some kind of task force to uncover and shut down these dog fighting rings? We know they are out there, right? Why aren't there federal agents played by a young Kevin Costner busting into warehouses and backyards across the country, leading dozens of people into paddy wagons? It isn't happening because it isn't blatantly in our face any more. It slinked back into the shadows and we left it alone. As long as Amanda Bynes isn't hurling phones and bongs out of hotel windows, Charlie Sheen isn't showing up drunk for interviews, Justin Bieber isn't racing his silver rocket car through rush hour traffic, these people can be crazy all they want. Just don't embarrass us with your crazy. Don't get your crazy on me. As long as your favorite NCAA team keeps its player payments, arrests, and false test scores quiet, it is fine. But if it becomes blatant, the team gets blistered.
All of this has come to mind as I observe the NFL. The National Football League is a mammoth industry that generates gobs of money. Its influence is not just felt in cities with teams, although those cities certainly do benefit a great deal. Its presence on television brings huge ratings and advertising dollars to those channels. Hundreds of companies are intertwined with the NFL: restaurants (McDonald's), soda companies (Pepsi), shoe companies (Nike), computer companies (Lenovo, Microsoft), pizza companies (Papa John's). It goes on and on. The NFL took in $1.07 billion from sponsorships last year. The last television contract was for $8 billion. That included CBS paying $275 million for the rights to simulcast Thursday night NFL games along with the NFL Network. They don't have any exclusive rights. Think about this - CBS is the number one network on television. On Thursday night they already had the number one comedy show on television. But they were willing to juggle their entire schedule for the right to run games that were already being shown on another network. The NFL is enormous.
The spillover effect of the NFL leaves its mark on college and high school athletics. As technological, medical, and pharmaceutical breakthroughs find success in the NFL, they work their way down the chain. The same goes for game planning. And for coaching techniques. And for desired athlete qualities. Yes, some things work their way back up the chain like the Nike and Under Armor uniforms from Oregon and Maryland or the wildcat formation. But for every one innovation that swims upstream, a hundred flow back down. As the offensive linemen in the NFL got larger and faster, that desirability moved down through the ranks. As quarterbacks needed to become more mobile, that quality was harvested from below. In addition to qualities trickling down, so did behavior. The NFL players make a lot of high risk, high reward plays. Defensive backs would launch themselves at wide receivers. Kick coverage teams fly around with reckless abandon. Running backs put their heads down and bull forward. Soon college and then high school players began to play the same way.
Through all of this, doctors were concerned about the overall health of younger football players. Only 6 percent of high school senior players will play in college. Only 1.7 percent of college seniors will get drafted by the NFL. That means 0.08% of high school players will ever make it to the NFL. Out of every 1,000 high school players, not even one will make it to the NFL. But that allure keeps players striving and aiming to be that one in a thousand. So, even though there are numerous health risks, players keep going. Offensive lineman pack on weight to reach the right size, even though they don't do it the right way and are really just massively obese. Young teens start weight training before doctors would advise that practice. These students tear up their knees, ankles, backs and doom themselves to a lifetime of pain. They sow the seeds of drug addictions by using painkillers at a disturbing rate - in addition to other pills like amphetamines and steroids.
Then there is the risk of concussions. Actually, it shouldn't even be called a risk anymore. It has basically crossed the line to an occupational hazard. The numbers are horrifying. I've talked about concussions before on this blog and there is a ton of research out there telling the truth about concussion dangers. Players get into dozens of collisions every game that are equivalent to a car crash. Some players estimate that they get into two to three plays per game that ring their bells and possibly give them a minor concussion. More and more players are talking about how they already have memory loss. Bret Favre, who has only been out of the game for a couple years, said he routinely forgets where he is or why he went there. Former players are committing suicide at an alarming rate. There are massive health repercussions from ALS to depression to Alzheimer's.
Now we are facing the specter of domestic violence as well. Ray Rice punches his fiancee out in an elevator and gets suspended for two games. The NFL reconsidered its punishment after the country lost its collective mind once the video footage hit the airwaves. Rice's lawyer has complained this is the NFL equivalent of double jeopardy, being tried for the same crime twice. They actually have some valid arguments there. There is just too much evidence that the Baltimore Ravens and the NFL knew the extent of Rice's actions and covered it up. So because they got busted and went into damage control mode, Rice got his contract terminated and his ability to play in the NFL revoked. Adrian Peterson, one of the biggest stars in the league, beat his four year old son so savagely that he had a dozen open lacerations on his body. I won't say he disciplined his son because this goes far beyond discipline. I have kids and understand the concept of punishment. I also have seen discipline that crossed the line when I was a child. Peterson was not just punishing his son; he was taking out his anger and frustration on him. He obviously was not in control in that moment. And it makes me wonder how many other times that had happened.
At the same moment all of this was happening, several other players were being charged with domestic violence crimes. The owner of the Dallas Cowboys was being investigated for sexual impropriety - which was largely brushed off because the statute of limitations had expired. As I watched the reactions of America, it was like it couldn't decide what to do. This level of corruption and horrific behavior usually would have triggered our offense mechanisms. But something stopped that. It was like the fact that it was football and we all love football halted us from going further. We got angry about Ray Rice and he was punished. But it stopped there. Some people were angry about Peterson, but others defended him because it fell under "corporal punishment" and no one wants to step on that issue. He was deactivated for one game while the investigation started. But the Vikings actually reinstated him for the next week before a bunch of people lost their minds and the team reconsidered. In the midst of all of this, the commissioner understandably came under fire for his gross ineptitude. He scrambled and danced in his press conference and managed to deflect the anger.
To be completely honest, I am fed up with all of it. I am angry. I have loved football as long as I have known about sports. I have great memories watching football: Sunday afternoons with my dad, Super Bowl parties, UCF games, Jaguar games. But I have reached a breaking point. This year, I have watched very little football. I have opportunities. Last night I was sitting on the couch watching TV and flipping over to the game never entered my mind. I shuttered my fantasy football league this year that I had run for over a decade. This isn't just a busy dad finding other things to do. This year should be the year I want to see the NFL the most. My favorite team (the Jaguars) drafted a UCF player (Blake Bortles) who is now their starting quarterback. I know his mom. She taught both of my sons in preschool. I remember him as a middle schooler. I should be glued to the tv during the season. But I just can't.
I'm not the only one that feels this way. My favorite sportswriter is Bill Simmons. I have read his stuff since he first got signed by ESPN. I love his writing style and his passion for sports. But I also love the fact that he is a fan first. He is irate over all of this. He has been attacking commissioner Goodell for his role in these scandals. Finally Simmons snapped on a podcast and went off on the commissioner. He called him a liar - something that the media almost universally has agreed upon. The end result? ESPN suspended Simmons for three full weeks without pay. What!?! A media member has been questioning the NFL for weeks and finally says what many fans are thinking. And he gets suspended? For three weeks!!! To recap, Ray Rice was originally suspended for two weeks for punching his fiancee so hard she fell backwards and got knocked unconscious. Then he dragged her out of the elevator like a sack of flour. Two weeks. Stephen A Smith, another ESPN personality who is a complete idiot, got suspended for one week for basically saying not to judge Ray Rice too quickly and that the fiancee "may have had it coming." One week. Adrian Peterson was originally suspended for one week for savagely beating his four year old. The other domestic cases originally had no suspensions. Mike Tirico, another ESPN turd, has been accused of several instances sexual impropriety with no suspensions. Jerry Jones, owner of the Cowboys, was accused of sexual impropriety with no suspension. Bill Simmons, tired of all of this bull, went off and was suspended for three weeks. Why? Because ESPN is the biggest partner of the NFL and pays $1.7 billion a year to show Monday Night Football. The NFL told ESPN to get Simmons under control. You don't believe that happened? There is precedent. Years ago, ESPN ran an original series entitled Playmakers that was supposedly based on the NFL. There was drug use, rape, racism, homophobia. The NFL threatened to pull out of their relationship with ESPN if the show wasn't cancelled. Boom. The show is gone.
I don't get it. The NFL makes a giant deal about women's issues in October for breast cancer awareness month. It is the only time players can wear non-uniform elements, as long as they are pink. But there are players beating up their girlfriends, fiancees, and wives and the NFL does nothing. And we, as viewers, seem shocked. Why? These guys are hopped up on so many supplements and chemicals. They are in a culture where rage and lack of control is encouraged on the playing field. How long did we think it would take before that spilled over into their homes? Didn't professional wrestling teach us anything? Look at the number of former wrestlers who have died early, committed suicide, attacked their significant others. One of the saddest stories was Chris Benoit. He was considered a good guy. Then he killed his wife, his son, and himself. Why? Depression, concussion damage, steroid damage. "Well that's an extreme case!" Really?
December 2012. Kansas City, Missouri. Twenty-two year old Kansas City Chief player, Javon Belcher, drives to the Chief's facilities. He shoots himself in front of the head coach and general manager. It turns out he had murdered his girlfriend earlier. His body was exhumed last year and last week we found out that his brain showed evidence of CTE - the damage caused by concussions that causes people to lose their memories and control of themselves. He was 22. Look at the erratic behavior exhibited by NFL players. Donte Stallworth is speeding and strikes and kills a man in Miami. Ray Lewis (doesn't) stab a man to death in a parking lot. Plaxico Burress shoots himself in the leg. Josh Gordon keeps failing drug tests. Jonathan Martin and Richie Icognito have the most unhealthy and bizarre friendship ever, complete with accusations of bullying and racism. Jadaveon Clowney gets busted for driving over 100 mph down Interstate 77 twice in a week. There is a laundry list of this stuff. How long until this boils over? How long until the corruption is actually bad enough to make us do something? It is already blatant. It is already out of control. But I guess it hasn't affected us personally enough yet.
In 1991 there was a movie that came out called The Last Boy Scout. It starred Damon Wayans, Bruce Willis, and Halle Berry. It wasn't a very good movie. It took place in the world of professional football with Wayans as a pro player and Willis as a detective or something. There were tons of scenes that hinted at the excesses in the NFL: drugs, sex, money, ignoring injuries. But one scene has always stuck with me. It was one of the opening scenes. A player was taking back a kickoff and pulled out a gun and started shooting the would-be tacklers until he scored and then shot himself. It came out that this player was in deep with gambling debts and he felt he had to score to keep his family safe. I thought that was ridiculous. What player would shoot other players on the field like that? Less than 25 years later, would you honestly be that shocked if something like that actually happened? Chances are, it would be stunning. But not shocking. That should show you there is a problem. If a sport actually has fostered an environment where a murder on the field would not be spin-your-head crazy, that sport is out of control. My question is if that possible tragedy would even be enough to take down the NFL.
Showing posts with label Mike Vick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Vick. Show all posts
Sep 30, 2014
Jan 7, 2011
The Bizarre Case of Mike Vick
With the NFL playoffs starting this weekend, there is a new rash of articles about whether or not we should be cheering for Mike Vick, quarterback of the Philadelphia Eagles. For those three of you who don't know what this is all about, Vick was the superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons. Back in 2007, it was shown that Vick was in charge of a dog fighting ring - and was personally involved in the torture and killing of dogs. He then was sentenced to 23 months in prison. He served about 18 months of that sentence. Then he returned to the NFL. His first stint was as a backup and "wildcat" quarterback for the Eagles. This year, though, he worked his way into the starting job. And, over the course of this year, he has frequently shown the brilliance he used to exhibit, with a more mature temperament. The Eagles won the NFC East and are a scary playoff team.
Back in 2007, there was much uproar about Vick's wrongdoings. People came up with all sorts of suggestions for him. They wanted him stripped of endorsements (which happened), penalized for his signing bonus (also happened), banned for life from the NFL (didn't happen), and beaten and treated like a fighting dog (uh, I don't think this happened). Shoot, even I weighed in on the issue with this Pulitzer Prize winning post. I went back and read it and the following quote stood out from all of the other stellar points:
Normally, we here in America are complete suckers for a comeback story. We love it when a player hits bottom and then scrapes their way to the top again. Shoot, we don't just feel that way about athletes - we feel that about all kinds of people. Robert Downey Jr, Mickey Rourke, and Sandra Bullock are all examples of this. They were down professionally, and then we embraced them once they finally got their talent to match their opportunities - while not shooting themselves in the foot. Donald Trump went from an egomaniacal billionaire to a bankrupt egomaniacal former billionaire to a beloved egomaniacal billionaire again. George Foreman was more loved on his second run at the heavyweight championship, and turned himself into a multi-million dollar industry.
In sports, we have awards like "Comeback Player of the Year." We celebrate players who can make it back from bad years or injuries. It is part of the sports culture. We do the same thing with teams. Would the Saints have been so supported last year if they had not always stunk and if the city hadn't been underwater? We love stories like that - overcoming the odds to reclaim success. So why is Michael Vick still so hated?
His crimes were heinous. That much is true. Injuring and killing animals is depraved and shows a major moral deficiency. He did his time. He was reinstated. He worked hard to get back in shape - mentally and physically. And he was willing to take a secondary position. And he still has to deal with booing fans and newspapers running headlines like "Michael Vick: Top Dog." There are still fans who think he never should have been allowed back into the league.
It is bizarre. There are other players who have been suspended and brought back. Few have met the open hostility Vick has. Bret Favre has battled both painkiller and alcohol addiction issues - and scandalous accusations of his sexual impropriety while on the Jets. Ray Lewis stabbed a man to death (allegedly). Donte Stallworth killed a pedestrian. Jamal Lewis ran a drug ring. Manny Ramirez and multiple others did steroids. And that is not to mention the countless drug using arrests, DWI arrests, domestic abuse arrests, holdouts, and halfheartedly played games. So, why is Michael Vick getting the short end of the stick?
It comes down to the fact that there are two things you can't do in this world - hurt a kid and hurt a dog. Think about it. In the movies, that is how you really know a villain is a SUPER villain. They are willing to hurt a dog. I remember watching Independence Day in the theater when it came out. There was a scene after the aliens started to attack. Fire is boiling down the streets of Manhattan - destroying everything in its path. A small group of people race into an alleyway. Their dog is chasing after them. The whole audience was terrified the dog wasn't going to make it. Now, mind you, like five million PEOPLE had just been crispified. The White House was destroyed. All over the world, complete devastation. But, dang it, if that dog had died, it would have been too much to take.
I think that is the kicker. He hurt dogs. They are cute and innocent. And, according to Vietnamese people, quite tasty. That is not to minimize his crimes. But it is to remember that they were animals. he was sentenced. He did his time. He is allowed to come back. Good for him if he does well. Why should he be denied the opportunity to earn a living? Vick would have been better off running a real life Fight Club or a human trafficking ring than a dog fighting ring. Then, he would have probably already have earned redemption.
As for me, I have changed my view. I am glad that he was reinstated. And I am glad for him that he has made the most of his opportunities. Isn't that what our prison system is supposed to be all about? Isn't the goal to rehabilitate people? To teach them the right way to do things? So, by all accounts of everyone who knows Vick, that happened. He turned his life around, saw the error of his ways, and made a life change. Is he supposed to be punished forever? I don't think that is something that America stands for. As a Christian, I know that does not mesh with my beliefs.
I don't have a team in the playoffs this year. My Jaguars choked away their chance (shocking, I know). The Bucs were kept out of the playoffs by the powerhouse 7-9 Seahawks "earning" a spot. I have a soft spot for the Saints, because I like Drew Brees and I know Heath Evans - the Saints' fullback. (Oh, I'm sorry. I'll pick up that name I dropped.) And, even though the Patriots are annoying, I am very impressed with how that organization operates. But I will be cheering for Vick. I want him to do well and to succeed. That will give him an even bigger pulpit to speak out and teach others - and to show people that second chances do exist. I don't like what he did. But I like what he has become - and what lessons that can teach.
Back in 2007, there was much uproar about Vick's wrongdoings. People came up with all sorts of suggestions for him. They wanted him stripped of endorsements (which happened), penalized for his signing bonus (also happened), banned for life from the NFL (didn't happen), and beaten and treated like a fighting dog (uh, I don't think this happened). Shoot, even I weighed in on the issue with this Pulitzer Prize winning post. I went back and read it and the following quote stood out from all of the other stellar points:
My hope is that Vick and his buddies get a fast fair trial (supposedly in October). I hope that if they are truly involved in this, they are found guilty. And if they are, I want them to get the maximum sentence (six years in prison, huge butt fine). And then I want Mike Vick to be stripped of every endorsement he has. I want him to be banned from football for life. I want Nike and Powerade and the Falcons to sue him to get back signing bonuses and contract money. And then I want THAT to be the precedent for the other NFL athletes who decide to get involved in despicable actions. That would send a nice clear message.It was a pretty high and mighty position to take. But, what happens when Vick does something we don't expect? Instead of remaining that arrogant evil supervillain we all had gotten used to seeing, he actually seemed to change. He was a backup. He supported the started. He said all the right things - and seemed to really genuinely mean them. He created Public Service Announcements speaking out against dog fighting. He made donations to help protect animals. He has openly stated in interviews that he was wrong. And it wasn't that simpering apology we are used to with stars. He was explicit in stating his wrongness. He has apologized. He served his time. He worked his way back up to the top. And, when he got a second chance, he seized it.
Normally, we here in America are complete suckers for a comeback story. We love it when a player hits bottom and then scrapes their way to the top again. Shoot, we don't just feel that way about athletes - we feel that about all kinds of people. Robert Downey Jr, Mickey Rourke, and Sandra Bullock are all examples of this. They were down professionally, and then we embraced them once they finally got their talent to match their opportunities - while not shooting themselves in the foot. Donald Trump went from an egomaniacal billionaire to a bankrupt egomaniacal former billionaire to a beloved egomaniacal billionaire again. George Foreman was more loved on his second run at the heavyweight championship, and turned himself into a multi-million dollar industry.
In sports, we have awards like "Comeback Player of the Year." We celebrate players who can make it back from bad years or injuries. It is part of the sports culture. We do the same thing with teams. Would the Saints have been so supported last year if they had not always stunk and if the city hadn't been underwater? We love stories like that - overcoming the odds to reclaim success. So why is Michael Vick still so hated?
His crimes were heinous. That much is true. Injuring and killing animals is depraved and shows a major moral deficiency. He did his time. He was reinstated. He worked hard to get back in shape - mentally and physically. And he was willing to take a secondary position. And he still has to deal with booing fans and newspapers running headlines like "Michael Vick: Top Dog." There are still fans who think he never should have been allowed back into the league.
It is bizarre. There are other players who have been suspended and brought back. Few have met the open hostility Vick has. Bret Favre has battled both painkiller and alcohol addiction issues - and scandalous accusations of his sexual impropriety while on the Jets. Ray Lewis stabbed a man to death (allegedly). Donte Stallworth killed a pedestrian. Jamal Lewis ran a drug ring. Manny Ramirez and multiple others did steroids. And that is not to mention the countless drug using arrests, DWI arrests, domestic abuse arrests, holdouts, and halfheartedly played games. So, why is Michael Vick getting the short end of the stick?
It comes down to the fact that there are two things you can't do in this world - hurt a kid and hurt a dog. Think about it. In the movies, that is how you really know a villain is a SUPER villain. They are willing to hurt a dog. I remember watching Independence Day in the theater when it came out. There was a scene after the aliens started to attack. Fire is boiling down the streets of Manhattan - destroying everything in its path. A small group of people race into an alleyway. Their dog is chasing after them. The whole audience was terrified the dog wasn't going to make it. Now, mind you, like five million PEOPLE had just been crispified. The White House was destroyed. All over the world, complete devastation. But, dang it, if that dog had died, it would have been too much to take.
I think that is the kicker. He hurt dogs. They are cute and innocent. And, according to Vietnamese people, quite tasty. That is not to minimize his crimes. But it is to remember that they were animals. he was sentenced. He did his time. He is allowed to come back. Good for him if he does well. Why should he be denied the opportunity to earn a living? Vick would have been better off running a real life Fight Club or a human trafficking ring than a dog fighting ring. Then, he would have probably already have earned redemption.
As for me, I have changed my view. I am glad that he was reinstated. And I am glad for him that he has made the most of his opportunities. Isn't that what our prison system is supposed to be all about? Isn't the goal to rehabilitate people? To teach them the right way to do things? So, by all accounts of everyone who knows Vick, that happened. He turned his life around, saw the error of his ways, and made a life change. Is he supposed to be punished forever? I don't think that is something that America stands for. As a Christian, I know that does not mesh with my beliefs.
I don't have a team in the playoffs this year. My Jaguars choked away their chance (shocking, I know). The Bucs were kept out of the playoffs by the powerhouse 7-9 Seahawks "earning" a spot. I have a soft spot for the Saints, because I like Drew Brees and I know Heath Evans - the Saints' fullback. (Oh, I'm sorry. I'll pick up that name I dropped.) And, even though the Patriots are annoying, I am very impressed with how that organization operates. But I will be cheering for Vick. I want him to do well and to succeed. That will give him an even bigger pulpit to speak out and teach others - and to show people that second chances do exist. I don't like what he did. But I like what he has become - and what lessons that can teach.
Jul 20, 2007
Rhymes with Vick
The entire Michael Vick/dogfighting saga has really been unbelievable. For an athlete of his stature to even be close enough to the situation to be credibly indicted says something about his incredible lack of judgment. But before I get to Vick himself, there are some other things that I have been thinking about in relation to this story.
- The Modern News Approach is Dangerous - In my mind, Vick is guilty. I think there is too much pointing to that, the least of which is the fact he was even included in a FEDERAL indictment. However, the problem is that I am not alone. Everyone has an opinion already. This story has been covered 24 hours a day for two days now. There are 24 hour television news channels, talk radio shows, internet new, internet sports, sports television shows. It is a saturation of news. I was listening to Tom Brokaw on ESPN Radio's Mike and Mike yesterday morning. The hosts asked him about how he felt the story was being handled. He said exactly what I have felt for a long time. When there is this much coverage out there, it doesn't take long to cross the line to irresponsible journalism. I would go one further. On just about any news story, you pretty much exhaust the angles and facts in about four hours. Then you are stuck with two option: wait for updates or talk about the same stuff. That is what you find on the media outlets. You have people who keep talking and talking about the same exact details. And then everyone is desperately searching for leaks, hints, rumors, and updates. This has led to some of the irresponsible stuff we have seen over the recent past. People release news without confirmations. They use some questionable source as breaking news. Why have we had so many problems with government leaks lately? It all ties into this. The other major problem is that once you reach the point of saturation, the only way to stand out is to make off the wall statements. This is especially true in the sports news world. Every major city has AT LEAST one sports talk radio station. In Orlando we have two. Plus, ESPN has four TV channels, Fox Sports has one, CSS sports, Sunshine Sports (in Florida), and all the traditional news stations. There is a huge amount of babble going on. So many sports guys have resorted to making bizarre and controversial statements to break into that glut. That is how guys like Skip Bayless, Dan LeBatard, and Woody Paige jumped from newspaper guys to television guys. And that is how they stay there - they make ridiculous comments. I'm sure we aren't too far away from one or all of those guys defending dogfighting (if it hasn't already happened). I already have heard sportswriters defending Vick and his buddies by saying this is a racist issue. They also have tried to say that dogfighting is cultural among a group of African-Americans in the south. Really? That makes it okay? It didn't make racisim or slavery or polygamy okay. I think that we all should agree that if a cultural event involved murder and torture, it should generally be frowned upon in America. But some people have tried to defend this to get national airplay. The line between editorial and news is so blurred we don't even know what it is.
- Innocent Until Proven Guilty is Bunk - With the news going this way, that ancient concept of American justice is gone. All that matters is the initial news break. The follow-ups never get the same airplay as the first story - unless it is at the end of a whole overblown media cirucs (OJ, Michael Jackson, Paris Hilton). For example, if someone gets sued for something, that gets front page coverage. Ninety percent of the time, the suit has no merit or it gets dropped or the sued party wins or they settle. But this doesn't get the same recognition. So we hear about people suing McDonald's for getting fat. But we never hear that the courts laughed those people out of the courtroom. Or we hear someone getting charged with something, and then don't hear what happened. We assume that an indictment or getting charged with something means that person was found guilty. Now, a FEDERAL indictment is different than an average one. Those are usually extremely well researched. In most cases, it takes as much work to get a federal grand jury to indict as it would to get a full local trial won. Plus, you don't have the same risk of District Attorneys going out on personal resume building (like the Duke lacrosse case). However, in the court of public opinion, if a person is charged or sued they are seen as guilty. Sure, we may tack the word "allegedly" onto that - mainly with a sarcastic tone and a disdain for having to include it. This is soooo dangerous. With this mindset in place, if people ever do get arrested for political or religious stances, what chance do they have? In addition, it poisons the jury pool. It becomes harder and harder to find people without pre-concieved notions for the jury. What people are you left with? If they aren't aware of a major case even with this massive coverage, how in touch with society are they?
- In Sports, All That Matters Are W, L, and $ - The first statement out of Nike's Headquarters was that this whole incident had no bearing on their marketing for Vick's new shoe. They knew that this incident would not hurt sales, so they probably really wanted to rush out the shoes. Instead, that statement got torn to shreds in the press. Now they are delaying the release. Why? Do you honestly think that moms are going to stop their kids from getting the shoes because they are Vick's? Actually, there is a huge portion of people who would be buying that type of shoes who would be MORE likely to buy it now because Vick is in trouble. The NFL is not going to suspend Vick for now. The Falcons are not going to bench him until the trial affects his ability to play. Falcon fans are hoping he gets off. I admire the new NFL conduct code, but if they aren't going to use it on this, what strength does it have? The line in it that the player "brought shame or embarrassment to himself, his team, and the league." That doesn't describe Vick at all. That bong he tried to smuggle on a plane? Not embarrassing. And even if he is found innocent, having a dogfighting ring run out of his house by his friends? Nope, no shame there. Come on. Just because he's a star he shouldn't get treated different. This is the same as when Ray Lewis was charged with murder and still went to training camp. The same as when Jamal Lewis went to prison for SELLING DRUGS and didn't get suspended by the league. Ridonkulous.
- This Shows How Screwed Up Society's Priorities Are - Why is this such a heinous story? Because dogs are involved. I have said before, the best way to show that a character is a villain in a movie is to have them kill a dog. What happened in Virginia is horrible and disgusting. I think that it shows a degenerate mind. But is there this kind of uproar when people are mistreated? When a child is abused or neglected, when a homeless person is beaten, when an innocent citizen is shot, when a senior citizen is abandoned, when a baby is aborted (oops, I went there). There may be news coverage of something, but it is not intense. We are used to and jaded to ordinary, run of the mill human abuse. The only thing that shocks us out of that is something truly shocking (Virginia Tech shooting, Chris Benoit murders). I think there should be outrage over this Vick thing. Don't think I am saying anything else. But I also wish that we saw humans as worth protecting as those dogs.
As far as Vick goes, I think that it doesn't look good for him. Personally, even if he was completely clueless about the ring, even if he was totally innocent, I think he has to be held responsible for being an accessory to the whole thing. It was his house, his friends, his family members. To say that no one ever slipped in talking around him, that they completely covered their tracks whenever he was at the house, is to really stretch the limits of credibility. He had to have known something, seen a cage, heard the dogs crying, noticed the cars. At first, it looked like he was at worst a passive party in the ring. Now the new evidence that led to his indictment shows that he was involved in the money end AND the dog execution. I think it speaks boatlaods about this whole thing that NO ONE is stunned that Michael Vick was invovled. It is almost like the only question is HOW involved he was. That doesn't speak well of his reputation that with all these people talking about this (even the shock jocks), not a single person has come forward and said, "I can't picture Mike being involved in this. He is not the type of person who would stomach this or allow this." They all just want to know if he actually killed the dogs - which is something they can totally believe him doing. Wow. You must be a real jerk to have your friends not even shake their heads when you get indicted for killing dogs. This is probably the most damning evidence I have heard.
If someone like Drew Brees or LaDamian Tomlinson or Reggie Bush were accused of this, we would be stunned. It would even go so far as to say if Terrell Owens or Keyshawn Johnson or Chad Johnson - some of the more annoying players - were named in this, we would have a hard time believing it. But Vick is named, and we all go, "Sound about right." Man. Those Vick boys are something else. His brother gets accused of rape, assault, and drug use and is such a problem he actually got kicked off the Virginia Tech team - and then is arrogant and uncooperative when the Dolphins stupidly gave him a chance. Mike had about above some of the fray until recently, when it seemed like he stopped trying to cover his scummy nature. My hope is that Vick and his buddies get a fast fair trial (supposedly in October). I hope that if they are truly involved in this, they are found guilty. And if they are, I want them to get the maximum sentence (six years in prison, huge butt fine). And then I want Mike Vick to be stripped of every endorsement he has. I want him to be banned from football for life. I want Nike and Powerade and the Falcons to sue him to get back signing bonuses and contract money. And then I want THAT to be the precedent for the other NFL athletes who decide to get involved in despicable actions. That would send a nice clear message.
- The Modern News Approach is Dangerous - In my mind, Vick is guilty. I think there is too much pointing to that, the least of which is the fact he was even included in a FEDERAL indictment. However, the problem is that I am not alone. Everyone has an opinion already. This story has been covered 24 hours a day for two days now. There are 24 hour television news channels, talk radio shows, internet new, internet sports, sports television shows. It is a saturation of news. I was listening to Tom Brokaw on ESPN Radio's Mike and Mike yesterday morning. The hosts asked him about how he felt the story was being handled. He said exactly what I have felt for a long time. When there is this much coverage out there, it doesn't take long to cross the line to irresponsible journalism. I would go one further. On just about any news story, you pretty much exhaust the angles and facts in about four hours. Then you are stuck with two option: wait for updates or talk about the same stuff. That is what you find on the media outlets. You have people who keep talking and talking about the same exact details. And then everyone is desperately searching for leaks, hints, rumors, and updates. This has led to some of the irresponsible stuff we have seen over the recent past. People release news without confirmations. They use some questionable source as breaking news. Why have we had so many problems with government leaks lately? It all ties into this. The other major problem is that once you reach the point of saturation, the only way to stand out is to make off the wall statements. This is especially true in the sports news world. Every major city has AT LEAST one sports talk radio station. In Orlando we have two. Plus, ESPN has four TV channels, Fox Sports has one, CSS sports, Sunshine Sports (in Florida), and all the traditional news stations. There is a huge amount of babble going on. So many sports guys have resorted to making bizarre and controversial statements to break into that glut. That is how guys like Skip Bayless, Dan LeBatard, and Woody Paige jumped from newspaper guys to television guys. And that is how they stay there - they make ridiculous comments. I'm sure we aren't too far away from one or all of those guys defending dogfighting (if it hasn't already happened). I already have heard sportswriters defending Vick and his buddies by saying this is a racist issue. They also have tried to say that dogfighting is cultural among a group of African-Americans in the south. Really? That makes it okay? It didn't make racisim or slavery or polygamy okay. I think that we all should agree that if a cultural event involved murder and torture, it should generally be frowned upon in America. But some people have tried to defend this to get national airplay. The line between editorial and news is so blurred we don't even know what it is.
- Innocent Until Proven Guilty is Bunk - With the news going this way, that ancient concept of American justice is gone. All that matters is the initial news break. The follow-ups never get the same airplay as the first story - unless it is at the end of a whole overblown media cirucs (OJ, Michael Jackson, Paris Hilton). For example, if someone gets sued for something, that gets front page coverage. Ninety percent of the time, the suit has no merit or it gets dropped or the sued party wins or they settle. But this doesn't get the same recognition. So we hear about people suing McDonald's for getting fat. But we never hear that the courts laughed those people out of the courtroom. Or we hear someone getting charged with something, and then don't hear what happened. We assume that an indictment or getting charged with something means that person was found guilty. Now, a FEDERAL indictment is different than an average one. Those are usually extremely well researched. In most cases, it takes as much work to get a federal grand jury to indict as it would to get a full local trial won. Plus, you don't have the same risk of District Attorneys going out on personal resume building (like the Duke lacrosse case). However, in the court of public opinion, if a person is charged or sued they are seen as guilty. Sure, we may tack the word "allegedly" onto that - mainly with a sarcastic tone and a disdain for having to include it. This is soooo dangerous. With this mindset in place, if people ever do get arrested for political or religious stances, what chance do they have? In addition, it poisons the jury pool. It becomes harder and harder to find people without pre-concieved notions for the jury. What people are you left with? If they aren't aware of a major case even with this massive coverage, how in touch with society are they?
- In Sports, All That Matters Are W, L, and $ - The first statement out of Nike's Headquarters was that this whole incident had no bearing on their marketing for Vick's new shoe. They knew that this incident would not hurt sales, so they probably really wanted to rush out the shoes. Instead, that statement got torn to shreds in the press. Now they are delaying the release. Why? Do you honestly think that moms are going to stop their kids from getting the shoes because they are Vick's? Actually, there is a huge portion of people who would be buying that type of shoes who would be MORE likely to buy it now because Vick is in trouble. The NFL is not going to suspend Vick for now. The Falcons are not going to bench him until the trial affects his ability to play. Falcon fans are hoping he gets off. I admire the new NFL conduct code, but if they aren't going to use it on this, what strength does it have? The line in it that the player "brought shame or embarrassment to himself, his team, and the league." That doesn't describe Vick at all. That bong he tried to smuggle on a plane? Not embarrassing. And even if he is found innocent, having a dogfighting ring run out of his house by his friends? Nope, no shame there. Come on. Just because he's a star he shouldn't get treated different. This is the same as when Ray Lewis was charged with murder and still went to training camp. The same as when Jamal Lewis went to prison for SELLING DRUGS and didn't get suspended by the league. Ridonkulous.
- This Shows How Screwed Up Society's Priorities Are - Why is this such a heinous story? Because dogs are involved. I have said before, the best way to show that a character is a villain in a movie is to have them kill a dog. What happened in Virginia is horrible and disgusting. I think that it shows a degenerate mind. But is there this kind of uproar when people are mistreated? When a child is abused or neglected, when a homeless person is beaten, when an innocent citizen is shot, when a senior citizen is abandoned, when a baby is aborted (oops, I went there). There may be news coverage of something, but it is not intense. We are used to and jaded to ordinary, run of the mill human abuse. The only thing that shocks us out of that is something truly shocking (Virginia Tech shooting, Chris Benoit murders). I think there should be outrage over this Vick thing. Don't think I am saying anything else. But I also wish that we saw humans as worth protecting as those dogs.
As far as Vick goes, I think that it doesn't look good for him. Personally, even if he was completely clueless about the ring, even if he was totally innocent, I think he has to be held responsible for being an accessory to the whole thing. It was his house, his friends, his family members. To say that no one ever slipped in talking around him, that they completely covered their tracks whenever he was at the house, is to really stretch the limits of credibility. He had to have known something, seen a cage, heard the dogs crying, noticed the cars. At first, it looked like he was at worst a passive party in the ring. Now the new evidence that led to his indictment shows that he was involved in the money end AND the dog execution. I think it speaks boatlaods about this whole thing that NO ONE is stunned that Michael Vick was invovled. It is almost like the only question is HOW involved he was. That doesn't speak well of his reputation that with all these people talking about this (even the shock jocks), not a single person has come forward and said, "I can't picture Mike being involved in this. He is not the type of person who would stomach this or allow this." They all just want to know if he actually killed the dogs - which is something they can totally believe him doing. Wow. You must be a real jerk to have your friends not even shake their heads when you get indicted for killing dogs. This is probably the most damning evidence I have heard.
If someone like Drew Brees or LaDamian Tomlinson or Reggie Bush were accused of this, we would be stunned. It would even go so far as to say if Terrell Owens or Keyshawn Johnson or Chad Johnson - some of the more annoying players - were named in this, we would have a hard time believing it. But Vick is named, and we all go, "Sound about right." Man. Those Vick boys are something else. His brother gets accused of rape, assault, and drug use and is such a problem he actually got kicked off the Virginia Tech team - and then is arrogant and uncooperative when the Dolphins stupidly gave him a chance. Mike had about above some of the fray until recently, when it seemed like he stopped trying to cover his scummy nature. My hope is that Vick and his buddies get a fast fair trial (supposedly in October). I hope that if they are truly involved in this, they are found guilty. And if they are, I want them to get the maximum sentence (six years in prison, huge butt fine). And then I want Mike Vick to be stripped of every endorsement he has. I want him to be banned from football for life. I want Nike and Powerade and the Falcons to sue him to get back signing bonuses and contract money. And then I want THAT to be the precedent for the other NFL athletes who decide to get involved in despicable actions. That would send a nice clear message.
Labels:
2007,
dogs,
Mike Vick,
news,
radio,
society,
sports,
sports radio,
television,
Vick
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


